A Misguided and Disingenuous Manifesto
As an avid reader and someone who appreciates thought-provoking literature, I approached Josh Hawley’s book, Manhood, with an open mind and a genuine curiosity to understand his perspective on the subject. Unfortunately, I was sorely disappointed. Manhood can only be described as a misguided and disingenuous manifesto, filled with regressive ideas, shallow analysis, and political posturing.
From the outset, it becomes clear that Hawley’s aim is not to provide a nuanced exploration of masculinity but to further his own political ambitions. The book reads more like a calculated attempt to pander to a specific demographic rather than a sincere attempt to engage in meaningful discourse. Hawley’s rhetoric is littered with divisive language and partisan jabs, detracting from any semblance of intellectual rigor.
One of the most glaring issues with Manhood is the author’s narrow and archaic view of gender roles. Hawley seems stuck in a bygone era, where masculinity is defined solely by traditional values and outdated stereotypes. His regressive portrayal of manhood does a disservice to the progress that has been made in recent years in redefining gender norms and promoting inclusivity. The book completely ignores the complexity of modern masculinity and fails to acknowledge the diverse experiences and identities of men today.
|
Manhood: The Masculine Virtues America Needs – Josh Hawley |
Manhood review: Josh Hawley, moraliser, neo-Confederate and Tucker Carlson of the US Senate